![]() ![]() The Nougat 64-bit version with hyper-v a little faster than the Pie 64-bit version without hyper-v, however I think having the new Android version for it's newer apis and better compatability with newer games/apps make the tradeoff worth it. The 240 FPS resuits were worse than the 120 FPS results by a bit too. The OpenGL version was also significantly faster. My system is a relatively recent clean install of windows and has up to date drivers.īluestacks had corrupted/broken textures that showed as weird neon colors so even though it scored pretty decent I dont think I would trust it for much. 64-bit binaries were used where available. Also went through the pain of comparing directx to opengl for some of the emulators. I did test bluestacks at 240 fps in a few results just to see if it would make a difference but it actually scored a little worse than 120 fps. Everything was tested at 1920x1080, 120 fps (unless otherwise noted), 4 cores and 4gb memory since this was the highest some of these emulators would go. Can't really get a comparison if the benchmark only works in one of the emulators. most other benchmarks just didnt want to run or work in a lot of the emulators, GFX Bench, 3dmark, etc. I wanted to do more tests than just Antutu but. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |